Washington State just adopted a new teacher evaluation program (TPEP) and my district is working on how to implement it on the ground level. After sitting through a "steering committee" meeting I wrote an email in responding to a comment my assistant superintendent made. I believe that you could change the names and it could represent any school district in this state.
Dear Assistant Superintendent,
During yesterday’s TPEP meeting I asked about offering
different opportunities for teachers. Your response was that you would
need to go back to the building level administrators and talk with them because
having each teacher doing a different PD might be a workload issue for
administrators [paraphrased]. I’d like to respond to this:
The accountability movement has
shifted our focus, as teachers, away from covering material and towards student
understanding. I believe this shift is essential to improving
education. Teachers truly have to want each student to know and
understand. As teachers we have accepted the challenge to meet the needs
of individual students (differentiate) in order to ensure their success.
I would argue there is no teacher in our District that has “figured out
differentiation” because it is a mindset and will need continual adaptations to
meet the changing needs of students. This shift in mindset will continue
to increase the workload of professional teachers. As a profession
we have taken on this burden of differentiation in the pursuit of improving
education.
What are your thoughts? Have you already had this discussion in your district? What was the results? Are there any districts meeting the individual needs of teacher?
Mike Stratton